Licensing Processes

The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has the following three types of licensing processes:

1. Integrated Licensing Process (ILP)

2. Traditional Licensing Process (TLP)

3. Alternative Licensing Process (ALP)


1. Integrated Licensing Process (ILP) The ILP was adopted by FERC in 2003 and is the default licensing process for obtaining a hydropower license. The ILP was developed by a number of stakeholders including members of the Hydropower Reform Coalition. The ILP integrates the development of license application and environmental review, and it coordinates FERC and other regulatory agencies that undertake such environmental review. More information can be found here .

2. Traditional Licensing Process (TLP) The Traditional Licensing Process is a simpler process that may be more appropriate for less controversial projects or for exemptions or conduit projects. In the TLP, environmental studies can occur after the application is filed. In a TLP, consultation with stakeholders is limited and unlike in IILP, FERC participation begins only after a license application is filed. More information can be found here.

3. Alternative Licensing Process (ALP) Under the ALP, an applicant can combine the pre-filing consultation process and the environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) into a single process. Adopted in 1997, the ALP’s primary purpose is to facilitate the negotiation of a settlement that, when filed with FERC, may serve as the basis for a new license. More information can be found here.

See the comparison of the three licensing processes on FERC's website.