Making End-of-Life Decisions on Aging Dams – PPIC interview with Dr. Andrew Rypel

Published 11/10/2020  |  California Trout

California has thousands of dams, from small earthen barriers to large dams hundres of feet tall. more than 1,400 of those dams are large enough to fall under state safety regulations. A great number of them provide critical water supply, flood control, and hydroelectric power. But many have outlived their functional lifespan and the ecosystem and economic benefits of removal far outweigh the cost of leaving them in place.

In 2019, CalTrout published the Top 5 California DAMS OUT Report which highlights five dams that are ripe for removal and that must, for the health of the ecosystem and communities around them, come out.

Our partners at the Public Policy Institute of California (PPIC) published an interview with Dr. Andrew Rypel, the Peter B. Moyle and CalTrout endowed Chair in Coldwater Fishes and co-director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences on the need to develop tools to help prioritize dam removals in California.

Below is an excerpt from their article published on November 9, 2020

California’s nearly 1,500 large dams are aging, and many pose hazards to communities downstream. We talked to Andrew Rypel—co-director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences, and one of the authors of an article on “deadbeat dams” in California and the nation—about what we should do about this aging dam population.

photo - Andrew Rypel

PPIC: What constitutes a deadbeat dam?

ANDREW RYPEL: These are dams that have outlived their functions and have become less of a benefit and more of a problem. Dams are built for many purposes, but most result in ecological costs to fish and wildlife. And as they age, many become unsafe, especially if they are not maintained. There are 100,000 dams in the US Army Corps of Engineers’ National Inventory of Dams (NID) database, and most are more than 50 years old. California’s dams are even older, with an average age of about 72 years. Like humans, these structures start having health problems as they age. When you live in a seismically active region that is also prone to intense flooding, as California is, it’s critical to evaluate how capable these older dams are of protecting human life in the event of an earthquake or flood.

PPIC: One solution for deadbeat dams is to remove them, but that’s expensive and controversial. How do you prioritize which ones to remove?

AR: Efforts to remove large dams in California have been slow and expensive, but we’ve made some progress—for example, the removal of a dam in Carmel and efforts to remove dams on the Klamath and the Eel Rivers continue. But can California develop a better process than the one we have now—perhaps more aggressive and forward-looking, so we deal with issues before they become bigger, more costly problems? That’s the million-dollar question.

One of the challenges is that so many of the state’s dams are under local management, often with private owners and many different stakeholders. Even though the solutions are inherently local, statewide guidance would help—possibly a blue-ribbon panel that gathers input from the scientific community and dam experts, stakeholder groups, and state leaders. This group could develop a decision-making framework and other tools for prioritizing dam removals.

The post Making End-of-Life Decisions on Aging Dams – PPIC interview with Dr. Andrew Rypel appeared first on California Trout.

From our Resource Library

Case Studies

Skagit River Project

See all resources

Email newsletter