|Current status||Active |
|Type of facility||Conventional Hydro|
|Mode of hydropower generation||Run-of-river|
|Type of permit||FERC License|
|FERC docket #||P-2778|
Ownership and operation
|Owner||Idaho Power Co|
|Owner type||Investor-Owned Utility|
|Year first online (conventional hydro)||1921|
|Transmission or distribution system owner||Idaho Power Co|
Power and generating capacity
|Number of units||1|
|Total capacity from hydraulic turbine-generator units within each plant||11.5 mW|
|Average annual net hydropower generation||77,333.2 mWH|
The Shoshone Falls, Upper and Lower Salmon Falls, and the Bliss projects are together referred to as the mid-Snake projects. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued licenses for the mid-Snake projects and the C.J. Strike project at once based on the multi-party settlement which encompasses all five projects.
The Mid-Snake Projects are located on the Snake River in south-central Idaho near the cities of Hagerman and Bliss, Idaho. The projects span more than 25 miles, from the main diversion dam at the Upper Salmon Falls Project downstream to the Bliss Dam. Between these facilities are the Lower Salmon Falls Dam and a free-flowing stretch of the Snake River known as the Wiley Reach.
Water Quality Issues: Unnaturally stagnant river. Increased turbidity resulting from construction of new powerhouse. Low seasonal DO levels in deep portions of project reservoir.Fishery Values: Very little in this stagnant section of the Snake,Threatened/Endangered: Snake River physa, Utah valvata, and Bliss Rapids snailsRecreational Values: Boat ramp, viewing of falls.Other Values: Shoshone Falls regulates the flow of water over Shoshone Falls. In the spring of 2006, Shoshone thundered for weeks with about 20k cfs and was a huge tourist draw since the drought had kept the falls virtually dry for the last seven years.Issues:In August 2006 Idaho Power filed an Application for Amendment of License, requesting an extension of its license with FERC. It is planning to increase the generating capacity of its turbines from 12.5 MW to 50 MW while barely increasing environmental mitigation measures. Normally FERC only issues longer licenses when there is significant environmental mitigation being proposed, such as fish passage. Under Idaho Power’s proposed terms, with the larger generator, the utility would decrease flows over the waterfalls, effectively “turning on” the falls only on Friday afternoon and weekends during the summer when visitor numbers are highest. Furthermore, the generating capacity of the proposed generator well exceeds the capacity possible at the site because of flow levels of the Snake River. As a result there is much speculation that Idaho Power is motivated to upgrade the powerhouse to benefit from a tax break under the terms of section 1301 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005.FERC approved the amendment application in July 2010 and extended the license term by another 10 years effectively extending the license until July 31, 2044.